Monday, 3 December 2012

Я люблю Київ

All right, my silent blog visitors, I can see quite a few clicks coming from beautiful Ukraine... and I've got "bait" to (hopefully) make you comment.
If my health allows it, I'm planning to go spend a few days in Ukraine - probably next Spring.
My main aim is going to be Kiev, but I'd like to hop by Odessa, too.

So, first, confession time: the title of this post might be an attempt at Ukrainian, but I just started Russian in fact (I'll learn Ukrainian once I've tackled more Russian, I promise). Will (very) elementary Russian, fluent English and French and bits of Spanish and German be enough for the trip?

Would you have tips? Things to see, do, eat, avoid like the plague.........
C'mon! Help a fellow Earthling.

Good Cause, Wrong (High) Horse

I can understand that when you want to see evil somewhere, you'll find it, but I'm so angry that I've got to growl a bit because of an Op-Ed I've just caught in The Advocate.
It's there... Go and read it for yourself. Perhaps you'll think that I'm the one who doesn't get it, but I've got to get this off my chest.
The author sounds pretty angry that some CSI characters deal with another character as a man, because he states that the character is clearly a transgender one. Erm... perhaps I didn't see the same thing, but it never occurred to me that this character was a transgender one. Never ever. It was clear that the character was a transvestite, and just that.
You can blame:
                         - casting
                         - wardrobe
                         - director (if you want)
BUT the writers meant to have a transvestite bloke with a broken teapot, or a medical condition, or... as it turned out, who was higher than a kite above the ISS.

There are so many real problems that it's a disservice to the cause and all transgender people who need love and protection, to see evil where there's nothing worth getting your underwear in a twist.
Perhaps the filming was really bad, and the make-up, and the dress, but once it's obvious that the character is short a few marbles, or something, the entire "I'm a woman and I'm pregnant" line takes a different turn and dimension.

Now... I surfed a bit, and until I caught the Op-Ed, no one saw the transvestite character as a transgender one being mocked. Granted, I found a few very disappointing "tranny" references, but that's all.

I'll admit that I'm angry. Not because I'm a CSI fan (I mostly lost interest when Grissom left), but because the author is directing his anger at something that doesn't deserve it.
I'll take for example the reference to the episode 8 of season 5: when the author mentions only the doctor who committed the crime that's being investigated, he doesn't say a single word about the way, throughout the entire episode, Grissom treats Mimosa, the gal who helps him find the truth. That character, Grissom, behaves like a gentleman, treats her like a lady and tries to cheer her up in the conclusion of the episode.
So, yes, the culprit was a MtF trans (for Body #1), but Body #2 was killed by her husband.

You see, between the blinkers the author seems to be fond of, and the blatant ignorance of positive points in plots, I ended up with my blood boiling.
Growling at a franchise for wrong reasons isn't going to educate the public and the happy bunch of idiots who insist on using the wrong pronoun (for whatever nutty reason) once a change is started. The trolls and thugs who physically and verbally abuse our trans brothers and sisters do so because they've got the brains of the average cavemen.
I find the CSI casting obvious and predictable and the plots are mostly going south, but the latest episode never was about a transgender character. FULL STOP.

If the author's group's been monitoring CSI, as it is said in the article, it looks as if they've never properly listened to the Grissom character, the one who told his team to look beyond the appearances.
Yes, people (viewers and various telly addicts) need to be shown good examples, but methinks someone's barking up the wrong tree...

*off the soap box*

Saturday, 1 December 2012

Of Incompetent, Lying Bankers - Take 2 (Lights, Camera, Action!)

I haven't been around long enough to update the bank situation, but it's so Kafkaesque that I've got to share these adventures with you now...

Do you remember the letter that I got from Bank #3 where someone tried to charge my dead account for some current running costs? It turns out that it was perfectly "normal"... since I thought that it had been closed since last August, whilst the final step hadn't been taken, and the account was still on life support.
The advisor, who is still super nice and efficient, rectified everything in thirty seconds.
Lend me a wall, I need to crack my skull!

Oh, and now for something just as Kafkaesque: Bank #1, where I e-mailed my silent and basically uninterested advisor in order to ask her if she still had a trace of my mother's mandate on MY account and she answered about my lost mandate on my MOTHER's account. Can't people read?! [Don't bother answering, I know... I know... Or comment with barmy bank stories of your own]
Since the cherry on the icing on that frigging cake was that she'd used the wrong title to address me in her answer, I grabbed the phone, though I really had another fish to fry that day, and I told her she'd missed the plot.
She did apologize, but that doesn't change the fact that her branch has lost my mother's mandate on my account, which means that were I stuck in hospital for whatever reason, Mother could not use my account in that bank.
December quiz: Guess which account is going dormant again because of an uncaring advisor in an incompetent branch?

I can feel a tiny lil' letter for the manager taking shape in my brain: if they lose their archives that easily (and aren't bothered one bit!), why should we trust them with our hard-won money in the first place?

Saturday, 17 November 2012

Of Incompetent, Lying Bankers

There are many good things when you live in the E.U., and there are a few idiotic things.
Today's topic is: bankers and their arrogance (and irremediable stupidity).

I've had three banks in my life. Let's use no name, and just call them 1, 2 and 3.

Bank #1 became my bank as soon as I came of age. 
It was Mother's bank (as well, it was down my street and that was very useful).
Things began going south when I gave them a cheque and they credited it... on Mother's account. I sent a scathing letter to the director, and he apologized (I still have that letter somewhere; perhaps I should frame it and display it proudly).
Things went from bad to worse, and I went to Bank #2, but… I never closed my account at Bank #1 (I left about £4 on it).

Bank #2 is still my main bank. At one point, I had a lot of hourly paid classes, and I saved a bit of money (I saved enough to not quiver with fear now that I’m down to one teaching job with few hours. However, I’m not worth abducting – except if you take books as a currency). So, since my main account is never in the red, and I’ve got a few pennies on a kind of savings account, my bank advisor is blissfully leaving me alone (that’s going to be important in a few paragraphs).

Not wanting to keep all my eggs in the same basket, I opened a third account in Bank #3. This one had a bank advisor who promised me that he’d do some trick, bank thingy, magic, book cooking or I don’t know what (and I don’t care what!) so that I’d never pay the bank fee to manage my account (it’s one of my principles: I leave my hard-won money in banks so they can make some profit by lending it to people who need it, but I don’t pay them for the “privilege” of having an account with them. I’m no frelling sheeple).

Three things happened at Bank #3. First, they treated my mother, who had an account there, too, as if she had the plague for daring to ask her advisor to be polite, then (according to some E.U. new thingy to make sheeple think that the states a looking for, and hunting, terrorists and criminals) they asked me to give proof of my identity (you know, that thing I’d done when I opened the account three years earlier), and I was told that I’d have to pay some fee for my account management. I closed that account at the speed of light, after some rock’n’roll adventures: the gal I had on the phone told me to write a letter and come give it to my advisor.
I met that advisor for the first time the day I closed my account. She was, it may be said, charming; all the more since her colleague had forgotten to give me half the info I needed! She did her best, and that account has been closed since last August. Since that account was a bit like a piggybank with a real safe, I transferred the money to… Bank #1 (where I’ve been, I remind you, since I came of age, and that wasn’t five years ago).

And now, for the list of lies and proof of incompetence:
Four years ago, Bank #2 sent me some bumph in order to give proof of my identity, tell them where I work, and other personal stuff (you’d think that the wages sent to my account would be a clue). I never answered, and since it was back when I had three decent jobs, you bet that my advisor left me alone.
I’m neither a terrorist, nor a criminal, and a quick look at my account will tell you that.

Four years ago, Bank #1, with my £4 on my dormant account, didn’t send me anything. No sign of life from them. With £4, we’ll say that it might have been logical.
Was it?
No.
There’s about £200 on that account now, and my brand new advisor would like to meet me (to get the E.U. thingy info, I bet). I was the one who had to contact her. Perhaps she’s being slaved and has thousands of accounts to manage (not a clue, and I seriously do not care), but I’m a bit shocked that an account being used again after so many years didn’t raise a single flag. Cherry on the cake: I’ve been too unwell to contact her for a third time, but she’s not bothered at all, and I haven’t heard from her (then again, with £200, I’m probably just barely plankton in her ocean).

Another branch of Bank #1 (Mother’s) has lost the mandate I signed to be allowed to operate her account last year, and the director is trying to pretend that I never signed the bloody thing – he also tried to say that it might be because I didn’t give proof of my identity that the paper wasn’t archived (he never asked me to give proof of my identity in any way, and I’m so going to read him the Riot Act on the phone if he keeps pretending that he did or that I didn’t sign the proper papers).
They just all love bumph (and they love to lose it!).

I was also shocked when I had to give my signature again at Bank #1. Explanation: they didn’t have it on computer (apparently, they’ve been eating the papers I gave them and the things I signed when I opened that account). In consequence, and because of the stupidity at the other branch, I’m going to have to check that they haven’t lost my mother’s mandate on my account…

It’s very cute to make sheeple believe that the 1984 adaptation is to fight terrorism and crime when it’s really to control people. Those people (terrorists and criminals) don’t use banks that bother them; they use banks that as long as you’ve got the references to an account allow you to deposit cash in vast amounts (Switzerland, Cayman Islands, places like that…). In fact, a few E.U. banks were caught red-handed asking too personal questions to clients. Why? In order to sell lists of info to commercial partners and/or to invite sheeple to the bank and have them invest money in bank-ish stuff. It’d be so nice if they didn’t take us for nuts (then again, if we consider the number of sheeple and the number of people who are too afraid to yell at them, they’d be silly to be bothered).

One last cherry on the icing on that particular cake? I just got a letter from Bank #3 (the one where I closed my account last August).
Are you with me? Someone there tried to charge my dead account for some current running costs. My former advisor caught it and rectified the BLUNDER, but it meant that a balance had to be sent to me. Guess who’s going to phone her former advisor in order to ask her to whom she should read the Riot Act… Yep! First thing on Tuesday after I’m caffeinated (I wouldn’t want to yell at the poor gal).
Now, if you’ll excuse me, I’ve got an e-mail to send to the lazy Bank #1 advisor in order to check that her branch isn’t completely managed by incompetents (yea, I know… I’m too optimistic).

Sunday, 11 November 2012

Writing News

Plot bunnies, it seems, need to simmer.
The one character in my P.I. Sci-Fi plot, who was being secretive and elusive, has finally deign to tell me who she is, and what she's going to do in the plot. That silly bunny took her sweet time, but it was well worth the wait!
No kidding! Initially, I thought she could be some sort of local animal, but I came up with something much more twisted, and completely linked to the general backdrop I've got in mind for that universe.
I could have pushed the plot bunny, but it would have been... not as good.

So, that's one thing settled.
I've got other short stories being written (three plots simmering, one being typed).
My second play is nicely taking shape as well (strangely, I seem to need to have two stories to work on at the same time, and I alternate days writing one short story and the play). I honestly don't know if it's going to be as good and/or interesting as the first one, but since it's a literary testimony and testament, this changes everything (at least, for me).

I have ideas for other plays, but I'll definitely need to do a tad of research.

Happy One Year Anniversary to Me... Or Not...

Back in Autumn 2011, I decided to launch a blog (and a Twitter account to go with it) in order to train my new literary voice and share things with readers.
I decided to launch both on 11/11/11. It would be, I thought, a good date...

So what's the general assessment?
Two friends and my brother are talking to me. The rest of the world is merely clicking and hopping by in complete silence (naming my blog counter "I Can See You" was a good idea: I can see clicks, but no one takes a moment to say anything).
The silence used to take its toll, but now... Now, I just know that communication is mostly dead, and it's not that I no longer care; I merely got used to the absence of communication. I mean, after my last post about that young artist who died, which is something that still makes me feel extremely sad and empty, something happened in Real Life that warped me at the speed of a neutrino into a nasty bout of Void (definitely getting used to that particular Sword of Damocles that, one day, is going to get me for good). When the Void strikes and takes me, I stop trying to interact on the Internet, and what happens then? Nothing. I was off Twitter for a fortnight, off here since my last post, and, in another literary incarnation, off another site since October 19th... and all I got is silence.
I've sent two SOS over the past months. It is now clear that my being here (I mean, on Earth, and alive) or not is uninteresting to most people.
A little something has changed in me; I'm not planning to walk back to my prior incarnation's haunting places. I'm done with that.
From now on, I shall be focussing on this new part of my life.

P.S.: BBH! If you read my posts and you're not my brother or the two aforementioned friends. Take a few seconds to say something. I. Can. See. You. (And normally, I don't bite, but I feel as if I'm living above rivers of slime and I'm the only one around being - remotely - unaffected.)

Monday, 15 October 2012

My Stupidly Broken Heart

A while ago, a young artist I barely knew died.
I never met that person, so I know that my next sentence is going to turn me into a candidate for Bedlam, but ever since I heard about that passing there's been a tiny hole in my heart.
I miss that person more than I miss some of my blood relatives who died.
I know it's weird, but that person was a very interesting artist, and I really, really wish I'd discovered more about that person's works before it was too late.

Last night, something odd happened. I was looking for some info, and as I often do, I hopped from link to link, and I eventually found myself on a page that mentioned that artist - a page that mentioned a Facebook page and a Twitter account.
Now... don't call Bedlam just yet, please, but, yes, I do find myself reading the frozen timeline of a young artist we've lost, and the few things I read have widened the little hole in my heart because that person was funny, witty, goofy, interesting, challenging, and now that I'm on Twitter, I really wish I could have tweeted that person.
I know that I'm somehow sorry for myself because I never even was on a stamp-sized map for that person, but what a bloody loss.
I'll keep reading these tweets from months ago. They're going to make me happy and sad, but I want to know more about that person, even now that that person's gone forever.

In my book (and no need to tell me it's silly; I know it is), the world became a tad darker and sadder the day that person died. I'll keep the tiny hole in my heart for as long as I'll live.
I've got no right to miss that person, but, hell, I do.

Typing & Reading & Editing

I feel like telling you about the various plot bunnies, so... here's a post just about them.

I'm editing old bunnies written by one of my other literary incarnations in order to try to keep my eyes "sharp" for the more recent things I wrote.
I've been reading things about the way to format a play, and I've been reading again a few plays I really like in order to see how things were done; I think I got all the stage directions and indications right now.
I'm going to let Paper Cranes simmer a little bit more now that it's properly formatted (I'll come back to it with fresh-er eyes in a few weeks).

I've been working on my second play, as well. Since the topic's very, very close to me, it's coming rather nicely. It won't be as long as my first one (I am the proud owner of a 106-page play), but it should be somewhat interesting.
Working on my plays, I found a topic that interests me. If I finally dive into it, I'll have to do some research because Hadrian and Antinous would be the main characters of this story. It's tempting and frightening at the same time.

I also have ideas for two other couple-related short stories (both would be tragedies this time, and I guess it's time to be courageous and tackle "no happy ending" plots).

I'm still working on the background for my Sci-Fi PI short stories. Most of the characters, the worlds, the philosophies are taking shape, but there's still one alien character who's playing hide and seek (there's got to be something that I must come up with about her that I haven't spotted yet).

And back to my keyboard............................

Saturday, 13 October 2012

The Lost Child

There might well be a Sordid Fairy Tale in the making with this entry, but I first only need to say what I saw on my way to work last Wednesday.
I was on my usual bus (the direct one that stops two streets away from work), and I had one eye on my book, and the other on the scenery around me.
At one point, we drive by a smallish garden where there are two nice playgrounds for the many children who come there with their mothers or nannies.

First, I saw a young man near the smallish slide (it’s built for children no older than about 6, I’d say).
Since there’s a bus stop right next to the garden, I had about a minute to observe the young man. I saw him climb on the smooth surface of the slide (which was odd and made me take a closer look at what he was doing), take position on the small platform and then slide down it as if he were riding an imaginary static wave, run once he reached the ground, be stopped by the railings and smile like a Bedlam resident high on something.
My first reaction, with one eye still somehow on my book, was: ‘He’s nuts!’, ‘He should be stopped.’ And ‘Good thing there aren’t any children here today.’

And then…

Then I tried to really pay attention, and it hit me like a ton of latinum. There was one child: the “young man”.
I really looked at him, and, though he was somewhat tall, he couldn’t be older than 17 (my money’s on barely 16).
And then there was the way he looked: decent clothes, but somewhat dusty – the kind that’s given by charitable associations to people who need them and that's worn until they fall apart.
And he looked Afghan.
His game took an entirely different meaning.
I know that there are many Afghan boys, who fled their country and ended up in various European countries where they’re like ghosts. I know that they try to gather in groups at night in order to protect one another, but by day it’s a different story.
Of course, I could be completely wrong, but I bet this teen was a lost boy, and when I came to that conclusion, I was disappointed with myself for my initial reaction [and even if he’s a local boy who was having some fun, he wasn’t destroying the playground, and I was denying someone a bit of fun for being too “old”. I’ve already slapped myself, thank you].
I could well be a victim of my wild imagination, but his boyish grin is haunting me, and I fear I spotted some sad tragedy right in my district.
Now, I imagine this boy alone, miles away from his country, fending for himself all alone, and claiming bits of normal childhood even if he looks too old for that.
I’m going to sound like a fool, but it broke my heart. He was grinning after he slid down and reached the railings, but no one was there to share that with him. He may be almost an adult (and I have no doubt that the authorities would treat him as an adult), but, right then, he was such a child. A lost child, alone in a foreign country.

My bus drove on, and I’ll probably never see him again, but he’s changed something in me.
I’ve got just enough money to take care of myself – and my cat – but this is with encounters like this one that I wish I could protect a few children and take them in or something [Note to the universe: never make me Dictator of the World, or I’d treat all the children on the planet as “mine”].

We’ll be a good species when our children don’t have to catch up on their childhoods in their teen years (or later, if at all). We must fight so our children can be children, and nothing else.